UK spends less on health care infrastructure than other EU countries

Author: Ingrid Torjesen

Like Comment

The UK is investing significantly less in health care capital, which includes buildings, equipment and IT, as a share of its gross domestic products (GDP) compared to most other similar countries, an analysis* from the Health Foundation suggests.

The analysis found that the value of capital per health care worker in the UK – which provides an estimate of the resources available to staff to deliver care to patients – fell by 35% between 2000 and 2017, while many other countries saw significant and sustained rises over the same period.

Of the countries analysed, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Greece, France, Italy, Netherlands, Austria, Slovakia, Finland, Sweden, Norway and the UK, the value of capital per health care worker in the UK was the second lowest after Greece, and only just over half the average value.

The analysis also shows that the UK is investing less in equipment and machinery, which includes spending on medical technology, as a share of its total capital.

While the Department of Health and Social Care has outlined a vision for a world-leading, tech-driven NHS, the UK was found to have the lowest value of machinery and equipment per health care worker, with countries such as Austria and Denmark having more than five times the value. In 2017, the UK put just 36% of its total spending towards this area of investment compared to an average of 48% in the other countries.

The data supports previous findings that the UK spends significantly less on health care capital as a share of GDP and that patient care is being compromised following years of underinvestment in the NHS’s infrastructure. For example, while the UK currently lags behind other countries for cancer survival, it has not invested adequately in new equipment such as CT and MRI scanners, and now has the lowest number of both CT and MRI scanners per capita among comparable countries – less than a third of those in Germany.

The funding suggests that recent government announcements of funding to upgrade hospitals will not be enough to bring the UK in line with the average spending of OECD countries such as Austria, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Ireland, Norway, Sweden and the USA. The Health Foundation has calculated that, for England alone, bringing overall funding in line with their average would require at least £2.5bn extra every year on top of the existing budget for 2019/20.

Data released last week revealed that the NHS in England’s backlog of maintenance and repairs had increased by £400m over the last year and now totals £6.6bn. The largest increase continues to be in the “significant” or “high” risk maintenance categories which need to be urgently addressed to maintain clinical services and protect patient safety. The “high” and “significant” risk maintenance backlogs rose by £38m and £253m respectively, and now stand at £3.4bn in total, representing over half the total backlog.

Anita Charlesworth, director of research and economics at the Health Foundation, said: “Health care capital investment has been in the spotlight recently with high-profile announcements of funding towards upgrading hospitals which the government has said will transform the NHS. While this is very much needed following years of underinvestment in the NHS’s crumbling infrastructure, the reality is that this money will barely touch the sides.

“Our analysis shows the UK is trailing a long way behind our European neighbours in terms of the resources that enable doctors and nurses to deliver high quality, modern health care. Whether this results in hospital wards with leaks and broken windows, outdated IT or not having enough scanners to detect cancers earlier, this lack of investment ultimately threatens standards of care and patient safety.”

Nick Ville, director of membership and policy at the NHS Confederation, which represents organisations across the healthcare system, said: “This report shows, yet again, that the government needs to invest far more in NHS buildings and equipment now and over coming years, so that standards of care for patients can be improved.

 “85% of leaders we surveyed recently said that the under investment in the crumbling NHS estate had blocked their ability to modernise their local services.

“Not only is more money needed but key decisions on where it goes should be given to local areas, rather than being at the mercy of national or political determination.”

*Kraindler J and Gershlick B. International comparisons of capital in health care: why is the UK falling behind? The Health Foundation, 24 October 2019.


Editorial team, Wilmington Healthcare

OnMedica provides high-quality, easy to digest content and CPD for UK-based GPs and clinicians. Our team of expert editors and clinicians develops content across a wide range of topics in a variety of formats—expert articles, bitesize news and quizzes, courses, videos, and more. You can explore OnMedica via the homepage, drop down menu or by typing your topic of choice in the search bar. Why not find out how OnMedica can help you to keep up to date quickly and easily?
4679 Contributions
2 Following