l

The content of this website is intended for healthcare professionals only

Career paths of male and female doctors are similar

But indirect discrimination still an issue with women in the NHS

OnMedica Staff

Wednesday, 03 June 2009

Direct discrimination is no longer a barrier to the career progression of women doctors in the NHS, according to a new study.

The findings, published today on bmj.com, are based on a survey of 7,012 doctors who qualified from UK medical schools in 1977, 1988 and 1993.

The results show that, although a smaller proportion of women than men progressed to senior posts, and men progressed more quickly than women to these posts, the career paths of women who had always worked full-time were very similar to those of men.

Part-time men and part-time women also had broadly similar trajectories which were slower than those of full-time doctors.

There was no evidence that having children disadvantaged the career progress of women who had always worked full-time, both in terms of the proportion who reached senior posts and the speed with which they reached them.

But there were important differences between men and women, and between full-time and part-time women, in their specialty destinations.

The authors say that, although these data indicate that there is no systematic direct discrimination against women in the NHS, indirect discrimination may remain and might include factors like working conditions that conflict with family life and lack of suitable role models in some specialties.

There can be no doubt that there were real barriers to women in medicine in the past, they added. However, with women now comprising 60% of medical school intake, it is important to ensure that women wishing to work part-time do not encounter barriers to career progression, such as inflexible career structures, they concluded.

These findings are reiterated in a report published by the Royal College of Physicians this week. Entitled "Women and medicine: the future", it states that "the main challenge ahead is no longer barriers to entry or delays to the career progression of women…." Instead, it sees the new challenge as being "to ensure that the increasing proportion of women is effectively, economically, and fairly incorporated into the workforce for the benefit of patients."

In a second study of 32,013 graduates tracked at regular intervals up to 25 years after qualification, the vast majority were shown to have remained in the NHS.

Some 88% of graduates with family homes in Britain were working in the NHS two years after qualification. Subsequent years showed a gradual, small decline: 86% at five and 10 years, 85% at 15, 82% at 20, and 81% at 25 years. Most of the doctors who moved outside the NHS remained in medical practice, either in Britain, outside the NHS or in other countries.

Among those with family homes overseas, 76% were working in the NHS two years after graduation and two thirds were still in the NHS 10 years after qualifying.

The percentage of women medical graduates who worked in the NHS was almost the same as that of men, refuting claims that women are much less likely than men to practise. However, a much higher percentage of women than men worked part time, a factor that needs to be fully considered in workforce planning, said the authors.

Registered in England and Wales. Reg No. 2530185. c/o Wilmington plc, 5th Floor, 10 Whitechapel High Street, London E1 8QS. Reg No. 30158470